[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1428671219-29341-2-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 15:06:57 +0200
From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] perf/x86_64: get_regs_user: Do report user_regs->cx while we are in syscall
Yes, it is true that cx contains return address.
It's not clear why we trash it.
Stop doing that.
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
CC: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC: x86@...nel.org
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
---
arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
index 7ab198a..a8d4e48 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -177,8 +177,6 @@ void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
* than just blindly copying user_regs.
*/
regs_user->abi = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64;
- /* usually contains return address (same as ->ip) */
- regs_user_copy->cx = -1;
} else {
/* We're probably in an interrupt or exception. */
regs_user->abi = user_64bit_mode(user_regs) ?
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists