linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.19 60/75] dm io: deal with wandering queue limits when handling REQ_DISCARD and REQ_WRITE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150410131710.669940089@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 10 Apr 2015 15:19:26 +0200
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.19 60/75] dm io: deal with wandering queue limits when handling REQ_DISCARD and REQ_WRITE_SAME

3.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>

commit e5db29806b99ce2b2640d2e4d4fcb983cea115c5 upstream.

Since it's possible for the discard and write same queue limits to
change while the upper level command is being sliced and diced, fix up
both of them (a) to reject IO if the special command is unsupported at
the start of the function and (b) read the limits once and let the
commands error out on their own if the status happens to change.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/md/dm-io.c |   15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/md/dm-io.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-io.c
@@ -289,9 +289,16 @@ static void do_region(int rw, unsigned r
 	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(where->bdev);
 	unsigned short logical_block_size = queue_logical_block_size(q);
 	sector_t num_sectors;
+	unsigned int uninitialized_var(special_cmd_max_sectors);
 
-	/* Reject unsupported discard requests */
-	if ((rw & REQ_DISCARD) && !blk_queue_discard(q)) {
+	/*
+	 * Reject unsupported discard and write same requests.
+	 */
+	if (rw & REQ_DISCARD)
+		special_cmd_max_sectors = q->limits.max_discard_sectors;
+	else if (rw & REQ_WRITE_SAME)
+		special_cmd_max_sectors = q->limits.max_write_same_sectors;
+	if ((rw & (REQ_DISCARD | REQ_WRITE_SAME)) && special_cmd_max_sectors == 0) {
 		dec_count(io, region, -EOPNOTSUPP);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -317,7 +324,7 @@ static void do_region(int rw, unsigned r
 		store_io_and_region_in_bio(bio, io, region);
 
 		if (rw & REQ_DISCARD) {
-			num_sectors = min_t(sector_t, q->limits.max_discard_sectors, remaining);
+			num_sectors = min_t(sector_t, special_cmd_max_sectors, remaining);
 			bio->bi_iter.bi_size = num_sectors << SECTOR_SHIFT;
 			remaining -= num_sectors;
 		} else if (rw & REQ_WRITE_SAME) {
@@ -326,7 +333,7 @@ static void do_region(int rw, unsigned r
 			 */
 			dp->get_page(dp, &page, &len, &offset);
 			bio_add_page(bio, page, logical_block_size, offset);
-			num_sectors = min_t(sector_t, q->limits.max_write_same_sectors, remaining);
+			num_sectors = min_t(sector_t, special_cmd_max_sectors, remaining);
 			bio->bi_iter.bi_size = num_sectors << SECTOR_SHIFT;
 
 			offset = 0;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/