[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1428676114.4309.112.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:28:34 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc patch v2] rt,nohz_full: fix nohz_full for PREEMPT_RT_FULL
On Fri, 2015-04-10 at 16:15 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Mike Galbraith | 2015-03-13 05:53:25 [+0100]:
>
> > First of all, a task being ticked and trying to shut the tick down
> > will
> > fail to do so due to having just awakened ksoftirqd, so let
> > ksoftirqd
> > try to do that after SOFTIRQ_TIMER processing. Secondly, should
> > the
> > tick be shut down, we may livelock in hrtimer-cancel() because in -
> > rt
> > a callback may be running. Break the loop, and let
> > tick_nohz_restart()
> > know that the timer is busy so it can bail.
>
> So with this patch
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-rt-users&m=142866940327602&w=2
Oh duh, too much of a hurry, I'll give that a spin.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists