[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150410154809.GN6023@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:48:09 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 4/6] regulator: axp20x: add support for AXP22X
regulators
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:09:04PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> This patch depends on the previous patch "regulator: axp20x: prepare
> support for multiple AXP chip families" and the mfd header from the
> first patch "mfd: axp20x: add AXP22x PMIC support".
> Could we merge both regulator patches through the mfd tree, with the
> other patches in the series? There are no other external dependencies.
Yes, of course we can - that's the whole point of me sending a
Reviewed-by! Half of what I'm trying to do with that is to cut down on
the number of reposts of MFD series I get sent :(
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists