[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55281068.3000309@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 11:03:20 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Pramod Gurav <gpramod@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, bryanh@...eaurora.org, jslaby@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] tty: serial: msm: Remove duplicate operations
on clocks in startup/shutdown
On 04/10/15 05:19, Pramod Gurav wrote:
> @@ -683,8 +679,7 @@ static void msm_power(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int state,
>
> switch (state) {
> case 0:
> - clk_prepare_enable(msm_port->clk);
> - clk_prepare_enable(msm_port->pclk);
> + msm_init_clock(port);
Hm... now we would call msm_serial_set_mnd_regs() whenever we power on
the port? Presumably we only need to do that once when we probe (or when
we resume from a sleep state that resets the registers, i.e.
hibernation) but I guess we're getting saved by the fact that the
if/else if pair in msm_serial_set_mnd_regs_from_uartclk would never be
true after the first time we call it?
> break;
> case 3:
> clk_disable_unprepare(msm_port->clk);
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists