linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs/proc: allow larger /proc/<pid>/cmdline output

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150410134520.06fc1a20f8b98a00fa768ca9@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:45:20 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:	Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
	Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/proc: allow larger /proc/<pid>/cmdline output

On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 17:11:40 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:

> > Just trying to be conservative and keep people from doing anything too
> > insane, but I didn't really have any particularly good reason beyond that
> > for capping it. I'll remove the upper bound next iteration.
> 
> There is no need for next iteration. Andrew has been ignoring real fix for more
> than a month now!

I haven't been ignoring it.  I'm desperately hoping that the patch fairy
will come up with something which is less large and complex :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/