linux-kernel - [PATCH RESEND] btrfs: unlock i_mutex after attempting to delete subvolume during send

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <00d6e1021fdd56192360d2eb0fb43130f3607fe1.1428700740.git.osandov@osandov.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:20:40 -0700
From:	Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
To:	Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] btrfs: unlock i_mutex after attempting to delete subvolume during send

Whenever the check for a send in progress introduced in commit
521e0546c970 (btrfs: protect snapshots from deleting during send) is
hit, we return without unlocking inode->i_mutex. This is easy to see
with lockdep enabled:

[  +0.000059] ================================================
[  +0.000028] [ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ]
[  +0.000029] 4.0.0-rc5-00096-g3c435c1 #93 Not tainted
[  +0.000026] ------------------------------------------------
[  +0.000029] btrfs/211 is leaving the kernel with locks still held!
[  +0.000029] 1 lock held by btrfs/211:
[  +0.000023]  #0:  (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8135b8df>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy+0x2df/0x7a0

Make sure we unlock it in the error path.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
---
Just resending this with Filipe's and David's Reviewed-bys and Cc-ing
stable.

 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index 74609b9..9fde01f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -2403,7 +2403,7 @@ static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(struct file *file,
 			"Attempt to delete subvolume %llu during send",
 			dest->root_key.objectid);
 		err = -EPERM;
-		goto out_dput;
+		goto out_unlock_inode;
 	}
 
 	d_invalidate(dentry);
@@ -2498,6 +2498,7 @@ out_up_write:
 				root_flags & ~BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD);
 		spin_unlock(&dest->root_item_lock);
 	}
+out_unlock_inode:
 	mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
 	if (!err) {
 		shrink_dcache_sb(root->fs_info->sb);
-- 
2.3.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/