[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2181841.0nPiIAbDNm@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 01:31:08 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>, guohanjun@...wei.com,
hanjun.guo@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Annotate physical_node_lock in acpi_scan_is_offline()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
acpi_scan_is_offline() may be called under the physical_node_lock
of the given device object's parent, so prevent lockdep from
complaining about that by annotating that instance with
SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING.
Reported-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -298,7 +298,11 @@ bool acpi_scan_is_offline(struct acpi_de
struct acpi_device_physical_node *pn;
bool offline = true;
- mutex_lock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
+ /*
+ * acpi_container_offline() calls this for all of the container's
+ * children under the container's physical_node_lock lock.
+ */
+ mutex_lock_nested(&adev->physical_node_lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
list_for_each_entry(pn, &adev->physical_node_list, node)
if (device_supports_offline(pn->dev) && !pn->dev->offline) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists