linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] kconfig: Print full defined and depends for multiply-defined symbols

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1428778617.17822.133.camel@x220>
Date:	Sat, 11 Apr 2015 20:56:57 +0200
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Stefan Hengelein <stefan.hengelein@....de>
Cc:	Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
	Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>,
	Andreas Ruprecht <rupran@...server.de>,
	Martin Walch <walch.martin@....de>,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kconfig: Print full defined and depends for
 multiply-defined symbols

On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 18:36 +0200, Stefan Hengelein wrote:
> If you're reading the dependency list as "what do i have to enable to
> be able to choose a value for FRAME_POINTER" and think, THUMB2_KERNEL
> would be a good choice to leave disabled, you're going to have a bad
> time.
> (The second definition in arm/Kconfig.debug doesn't have a prompt and
> the default has additional conditions)

Please elaborate on "bad time".

> I personally would prefer to
> additionally find the second definition that doesn't a prompt and
> other dependencies instead of adding them to the first entry, but
> that's just my personal preference.

I notice myself getting rather grumpy. (That usually translates to:
"Drop it, and revisit in a few days".) Let me explain.

This is the arm64 entry:
    config FRAME_POINTER
            bool
            default y

This is the hexagon entry
    config FRAME_POINTER
            def_bool y

This is the m32r entry:
    config FRAME_POINTER
            bool "Compile the kernel with frame pointers"
            help
              If you say Y here [...]

And this is the sparc entry:
    config FRAME_POINTER
            bool
            depends on MCOUNT
            default y

You'd expect these entries to yield really simple results when doing a
search in menuconfig. But the results show unparseable crap[1]. (And I'm
afraid Gregory's patch would make that even worse. Gregory: please prove
me wrong.)

So to the grumpy me it looks like either:
- menuconfig handles these redefinitions incorrectly in its UI;
- these redefinitions are actually complicated (as in: somehow they
concatenate the dependencies, etc.) and we should probably disallow
them. Because otherwise looking at a Kconfig entry tells you very little
about what is actually going on for the architecture you're interested
in.

What is the grumpy me missing here?


Paul Bolle

[1] The hexagon entry is interesting, probably because it sources
lib/Kconfig.debug _after_ it defined FRAME_POINTER for itself.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/