[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1428870659-5525-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 22:30:59 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
To: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: Make DP a consumer of DISP1 power domain on Exynos5420
Commit ea08de16eb1b ("ARM: dts: Add DISP1 power domain for exynos5420")
added a device node for the Exynos5420 DISP1 power domain but dit not
make the DP controller a consumer of that power domain.
This causes an "Unhandled fault: imprecise external abort" error if the
exynos-dp driver tries to access the DP controller registers and the PD
was turned off. This lead to a kernel panic and a complete system hang.
Make the DP controller device node a consumer of the DISP1 power domain
to ensure that the PD is turned on when the exynos-dp driver is probed.
Fixes: ea08de16eb1b ("ARM: dts: Add DISP1 power domain for exynos5420")
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
---
Hello,
This latent bug was not exposed before since drivers for other devices
marked as DISP1 power domain consumers were probed before exynos-dp so
the PD was already on which made possible to access the DP registers.
But "regulator: Defer lookup of supply to regulator_get" [0] that is in
linux-next from a couple of days now, changed the order on which the
drivers' probes succeed so the PD was disabled during exynos-dp probe.
Exynos5420 machines with a display such as the Exynos5420 Peach Pit and
Exynos5800 Peach Pi were failing to boot due this issue, i.e: [1].
Olof,
Could you please confirm $subject fixes the issue catched by your farm?
Krzysztof,
This patch conflicts with your Exynos5 phandle notation cleanup [2] but
I preferred to send it on top of linux-next instead of making your series
a dependency since it fixes a very important bug that had caused -next to
be broken on these matchines for days now.
Thanks a lot and best regards,
Javier
[0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/24/1167
[1]: http://arm-soc.lixom.net/bootlogs/next/next-20150409/pi-arm-exynos_defconfig.html
[2]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/12/49
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
index f67b23f303c3..45317538bbae 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
@@ -536,6 +536,7 @@
clock-names = "dp";
phys = <&dp_phy>;
phy-names = "dp";
+ power-domains = <&disp_pd>;
};
mipi_phy: video-phy@...40714 {
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists