[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150412094718.GA1667@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 11:47:18 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, henrik@...tad.us, juri.lelli@...il.com,
raistlin@...ux.it, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation update
* Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here is an update for Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt.
> Respect to the RFC I sent few days ago, I:
> 1) Split the patches in a better way, (so that, for example, Zhiqiang Zhang's
> authorship is preserved)
> 2) Tried to address all the comments I received on the RFC
> 3) Added another patch, to split Section 3 in various subsections.
> I think it is more readable in this way. Anyway, this is the last patch,
> so it can easily be skipped if people do not like it.
>
> I also split in a separate patch the discussion about the relationship between
> tasks' parameters and SCHED_DEADLINE parameters. This is (I think) the only
> part of the patchset that has not been previously discussed; I decided to
> isolate it in its own patch so that other patches can be applied anyway.
Note that your Signed-off-by lines are missing.
I also noticed the following inconsistency: 'utilization' (and
variants) is spelled in two variants in the text: 'utilization' and
'utilisation'.
I'd strongly suggest using 'utilization' et al (american spelling),
because that's how it's spelled in most of the kernel source.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists