[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <552A6209.9040903@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 14:16:09 +0200
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
To: Andrew <andrew@...mnt.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: mvebu: dts: Add dts file for DLink
DNS-327L
On 12.04.2015 13:43, Andrew wrote:
> Sebastian Hesselbarth писал 12.04.2015 14:20:
>> On 11.04.2015 22:29, Andrew Andrianov wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Andrianov <andrew@...mnt.org>
[...]
>>> + * CONFIG_ARM_MVEBU_V7_CPUIDLE=y causes hard freezes every 1-8 hours
>>
>> I don't think the dts is the right place for Linux issues.
>
> Not sure if that's a hardware weirdness or software issue (yet).
> Just checked - this goblin is there in 4.0-rc7.
I understand the issue, but still the dts is not the right place
for this comment.
[...]
>>> + marvell,nand-keep-config;
>>> + marvell,nand-enable-arbiter;
>>> + nand-on-flash-bbt;
>>
>> Do you know the ECC scheme used?
>
> Any hints on how to find it apart from dumping NAND controller registers
> from bootloader ?
From the original bootlog:
armada-nand armada-nand.0: Initialize HAL based NFC in 8bit mode with
DMA Disabled using BCH 4bit ECC
that translates into
nand-ecc-strength = <4>;
nand-ecc-step-size = <512>;
[...]
>>> + /* Hardwired into stock bootloader */
>>
>> I don't get the comment above.
>
> The stock u-boot is hacked with a 'failsafe' kernel address.
Ok, the above partition isn't passed by the bootloader on mtdparts
cmdline, i.e. that is why you call it "hardwired" ?
Just remove the comment, actually the whole partition table is
"hacked" into the stock bootloader.
> If for some reason running the 'bootcmd' fails, it reads
> 5MiBs from partition @ (5d00000 + 0x800) and tries to boot it.
> There's no way to change this via environment, only by replacing
> the bootloader.
> Personally I'm more happy with a simpler partition table, but I
> guess upstream should be oriented towards the stock bootloader.
Yeah, leave the original partition table. Any other, smarter
bootloader can replace it.
[...]
> Thanks for the review, I'll resubmit the fixed patchset shortly.
> Please disregard my [PATCH v2] messages. I've send them the moment before
> I noticed your email and review.
Please always leave the Cc-list in place.
And you should relax and leave patches there a day or two (or three).
Not everybody is reading patches immediately.
We are in no hurry, the current merge window is already closed,
the new one is 6 weeks away.
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists