[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150413104531.GB30556@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 12:45:32 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] PMEM driver for v4.1
* Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:33:09AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Limitations: this is a regular block device, and since the pmem areas
> > are not struct page backed, they are invisible to the rest of the
> > system (other than the block IO device), so direct IO to/from pmem
> > areas, direct mmap() or XIP is not possible yet. The page cache will
> > also shadow and double buffer pmem contents, etc.
>
> Unless you use the DAX support in ext2/4 and soon XFS, in which case
> we avoid that double buffering when doing read/write and mmap
Indeed, I missed that DAX support just went upstream in v4.0 - nice!
DAX may have some other limitations though that comes from not having
struct page * backing and using VM_MIXEDMAP, the following APIs might
not work on DAX files:
- splice
- zero copy O_DIRECT into DAX areas.
- futexes
- ( AFAICS hugetlbs won't work on DAX mmap()s yet - although with
the current nocache mapping that's probable the least of the
performance issues for now. )
Btw., what's the future design plan here? Enable struct page backing,
or provide special codepaths for all DAX uses like the special pte
based approach for mmap()s?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists