linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/3] perf probe: Fix segfault when probe with lazy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1428925290-5623-3-git-send-email-hekuang@huawei.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Apr 2015 19:41:30 +0800
From:	He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
To:	<masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>, <acme@...nel.org>,
	<a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <namhyung@...nel.org>
CC:	<wangnan0@...wei.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] perf probe: Fix segfault when probe with lazy_line to file

The first argument passed to find_probe_point_lazy() should be CU die,
which will be passed to die_walk_lines() when lazy_line
matches. Currently, when we probe with lazy_line pattern to file without
function name, NULL pointer is passed and causes a segment fault.

Can be repoduced as following:

  $ perf probe -k vmlinux --add='fs/super.c;s->s_count=1;'
  [ 1958.984658] perf[1020]: segfault at 10 ip 00007fc6e10d8c71 sp
  00007ffcbfaaf900 error 4 in libdw-0.161.so[7fc6e10ce000+34000]
  Segmentation fault

After this patch:

  $ perf probe -k vmlinux --add='fs/super.c;s->s_count=1;'
  Added new event:
  probe:_stext         (on @fs/super.c)

  You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:
    perf record -e probe:_stext -aR sleep 1

Signed-off-by: He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
index 431c12d..e91101b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
@@ -1067,7 +1067,7 @@ static int debuginfo__find_probes(struct debuginfo *dbg,
 			if (pp->function)
 				ret = find_probe_point_by_func(pf);
 			else if (pp->lazy_line)
-				ret = find_probe_point_lazy(NULL, pf);
+				ret = find_probe_point_lazy(&pf->cu_die, pf);
 			else {
 				pf->lno = pp->line;
 				ret = find_probe_point_by_line(pf);
-- 
2.3.3.220.g9ab698f

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/