[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <552BB4CA.6060808@plexistor.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:21:30 +0300
From: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] PMEM driver for v4.1
On 04/13/2015 01:45 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:33:09AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> Limitations: this is a regular block device, and since the pmem areas
>>> are not struct page backed, they are invisible to the rest of the
>>> system (other than the block IO device), so direct IO to/from pmem
>>> areas, direct mmap() or XIP is not possible yet. The page cache will
>>> also shadow and double buffer pmem contents, etc.
>>
>> Unless you use the DAX support in ext2/4 and soon XFS, in which case
>> we avoid that double buffering when doing read/write and mmap
>
> Indeed, I missed that DAX support just went upstream in v4.0 - nice!
>
> DAX may have some other limitations though that comes from not having
> struct page * backing and using VM_MIXEDMAP, the following APIs might
> not work on DAX files:
>
> - splice
splice works fine. Also I sent a cleanup in this area to Andrew it will
be in for 4.1
> - zero copy O_DIRECT into DAX areas.
DAX is always O_DIRECT.
What does not work is mmap of DAX file and use that pointer in an
O_DIRECT operation of another device. (unless it is a DAX device)
Also mmap of DAX file and RDMA or direct-networking. Will need
a copy.
All this is fixable by applying my page-struct patch for pmem
> - futexes
>
> - ( AFAICS hugetlbs won't work on DAX mmap()s yet - although with
> the current nocache mapping that's probable the least of the
> performance issues for now. )
>
> Btw., what's the future design plan here? Enable struct page backing,
> or provide special codepaths for all DAX uses like the special pte
> based approach for mmap()s?
>
I'm hopping for struct page, 4k pages at first and 2M pages later on,
which needs more work in IO stacks, where I need this most.
> Thanks,
> Ingo
>
Thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists