linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 16/17] target-s390x: Introduce S390 CPU facility test routine

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1428933396-37887-17-git-send-email-mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:56:35 +0200
From:	Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	qemu-devel@...gnu.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andreas Faerber <afaerber@...e.de>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
	Daniel Hansel <daniel.hansel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 16/17] target-s390x: Introduce S390 CPU facility test routine

The patch introduces routine s390_facility_test() which allows to
verify if a specific facility bit is set.

Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 target-s390x/cpu-models.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 target-s390x/cpu-models.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu-models.c b/target-s390x/cpu-models.c
index b696897..f218dde 100644
--- a/target-s390x/cpu-models.c
+++ b/target-s390x/cpu-models.c
@@ -715,3 +715,32 @@ void s390_cpu_model_init(S390CPUClass *cc)
         kvm_s390_set_processor_props(&proc);
     }
 }
+
+static inline int test_facility(uint64_t *fac_list, uint16_t nr)
+{
+    uint16_t word = nr / BITS_PER_LONG;
+    uint16_t be_bit = (BITS_PER_LONG - 1) - (nr % BITS_PER_LONG);
+
+    return (nr < FAC_LIST_CPU_S390_SIZE_UINT1) ?
+        (fac_list[word] >> be_bit) & __UINT64_C(1) : 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * s390_test_facility:
+ * @nr: facility bit number to test
+ * @cc: cpu class to test
+ *
+ * The functions tests if the cpu facility identified by bit @nr is available
+ * to the cpu class @cc.
+ *
+ * Returns: a boolean value.
+ *
+ * Since: 2.4
+ */
+bool s390_test_facility(S390CPUClass *cc, uint16_t nr)
+{
+    if (!cc) {
+        return false;
+    }
+    return test_facility(cc->fac_list[ACCEL_CURRENT], nr) ? true : false;
+}
diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu-models.h b/target-s390x/cpu-models.h
index 76673f4..23242aa 100644
--- a/target-s390x/cpu-models.h
+++ b/target-s390x/cpu-models.h
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ bool s390_cpu_classes_initialized(void);
 uint64_t *s390_fac_list_mask_by_machine(const char *name);
 uint64_t *s390_current_fac_list_mask(void);
 void s390_cpu_model_init(S390CPUClass *cc);
+bool s390_test_facility(S390CPUClass *cc, uint16_t nr);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_KVM
 int kvm_s390_get_machine_props(KVMState *s, S390MachineProps *prop);
-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/