lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:16:31 -0400
From:	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>
To:	Felipe <felipe.otamendi@...il.com>
Cc:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: Fix multitouch support for Type Cover 3

On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Felipe <felipe.otamendi@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
> <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com> wrote:
>> Hi Felipe,
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Felipe Otamendi
>> <felipe.otamendi@...il.com> wrote:
>>> Make the Type Cover 3 use the hid multitouch driver, which is better suited for the touchpad. Also, since it has multiple reports under the same interface, allow the generic hid driver to handle non-multitouch inputs such as the keyboard's.
>>
>> IIRC, the point of having hid-microsoft was to have better support of
>> the keyboard special functions and shortcuts. Can you please confirm
>> that you do not lose any functionality?
>>
>
> I've checked and all the keys work as they used to with the previous
> patch. The only thing that doesn't work is the led on the Caps Lock
> key. That's because the output from the keyboard report is being
> mapped as a different input than the input from the same report
> because of how inputs are mapped when HID_QUIRK_MULTI_INPUT is
> enabled.

That is worrisome. It means that there will be a regression with the patch.
If I understand correctly, with hid-microsoft, the Caps Lock LED
works, and not with hid-multitouch?

Can you share the report descriptors of the device? I might have had
one, but I can not find it.

>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Felipe Otamendi <felipe.otamendi@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/hid/hid-core.c       | 6 ++----
>>>  drivers/hid/hid-microsoft.c  | 3 ---
>>>  drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c | 5 +++++
>>>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
>>> index 56ce8c2..5a80896 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
>>> @@ -705,9 +705,8 @@ static void hid_scan_collection(struct hid_parser *parser, unsigned type)
>>>                 hid->group = HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB;
>>>
>>>         if (hid->vendor == USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT &&
>>> -           (hid->product == USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3 ||
>>> -            hid->product == USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3_JP) &&
>>> -           hid->group == HID_GROUP_MULTITOUCH)
>>> +               hid->product == USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3_JP &&
>>> +               hid->group == HID_GROUP_MULTITOUCH)
>>>                 hid->group = HID_GROUP_GENERIC;
>>>
>>>         if ((parser->global.usage_page << 16) == HID_UP_GENDESK)
>>> @@ -1878,7 +1877,6 @@ static const struct hid_device_id hid_have_special_driver[] = {
>>>         { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_DIGITAL_MEDIA_3K) },
>>>         { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_WIRELESS_OPTICAL_DESKTOP_3_0) },
>>>         { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_OFFICE_KB) },
>>> -       { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3) },
>>>         { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3_JP) },
>>>         { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MONTEREY, USB_DEVICE_ID_GENIUS_KB29E) },
>>>         { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MSI, USB_DEVICE_ID_MSI_GT683R_LED_PANEL) },
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-microsoft.c b/drivers/hid/hid-microsoft.c
>>> index af935eb..7e84463 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-microsoft.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-microsoft.c
>>> @@ -276,11 +276,8 @@ static const struct hid_device_id ms_devices[] = {
>>>                 .driver_data = MS_NOGET },
>>>         { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_COMFORT_MOUSE_4500),
>>>                 .driver_data = MS_DUPLICATE_USAGES },
>>> -       { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3),
>>> -               .driver_data = MS_HIDINPUT },
>>>         { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3_JP),
>>>                 .driver_data = MS_HIDINPUT },
>>> -
>>
>> Please keep this line, it adds extra to the commit and might have been
>> put on purpose by the original author.
>>
>
> Sorry about that. I'll correct the patch without this change.
>
>>>         { HID_BLUETOOTH_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_PRESENTER_8K_BT),
>>>                 .driver_data = MS_PRESENTER },
>>>         { }
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
>>> index f65e78b..d93c766 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
>>> @@ -1235,6 +1235,11 @@ static const struct hid_device_id mt_devices[] = {
>>>                 MT_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ILITEK,
>>>                         USB_DEVICE_ID_ILITEK_MULTITOUCH) },
>>>
>>> +       /* Microsoft Type Cover 3 */
>>> +       { .driver_data = MT_CLS_EXPORT_ALL_INPUTS,
>>> +               MT_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT,
>>> +                       USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3) },
>>> +
>>>         /* MosArt panels */
>>>         { .driver_data = MT_CLS_CONFIDENCE_MINUS_ONE,
>>>                 MT_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ASUS,
>>> --
>>> 2.1.0
>>
>> I had a similar patch in my tree at the time when we were deciding
>> what to do for those devices.
>> This patch had an extra hunk (sorry gmail will cut the lines and everything):
>>
>> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
>> @@ -961,6 +961,9 @@ static void mt_input_configured(struct hid_device
>> *hdev, struct hid_input *hi)
>>                 case HID_DG_TOUCHSCREEN:
>>                         /* we do not set suffix = "Touchscreen" */
>>                         break;
>> +               case HID_DG_TOUCHPAD:
>> +                       suffix = "Touchpad";
>> +                       break;
>>                 case HID_GD_SYSTEM_CONTROL:
>>                         suffix = "System Control";
>>                         break;
>>
>> Can you please test/add this with your current patch. Your touchpad
>> might appear as "UNKNOWN", which is not very appealing :)
>>
>
> It works, now it appears with the Touchscreen suffix. I should send
> the new patch as a response to this thread right?

I guess you meant "Touchpad" here.

No need to send the v2 as a reply to this thread. Just use the subject
prefix "PATCH v2" and that should be enough.

Cheers,
Benjamin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ