[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <552BD37A.8070505@parallels.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:32:26 +0300
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
"Rik van Riel" <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <cov@...eaurora.org>,
<criu@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] mm: Introducing arch_remap hook
>>> I initially thought it would be enough to put it into
>>> <asm-generic/mmu_context.h>, expecting it works as
>>> <asm-generic/pgtable.h>. But that's not the case.
>>>
>>> It probably worth at some point rework all <asm/mmu_context.h> to include
>>> <asm-generic/mmu_context.h> at the end as we do for <asm/pgtable.h>.
>>> But that's outside the scope of the patchset, I guess.
>>>
>>> I don't see any better candidate for such dummy header. :-/
>>
>> Clearly, I'm not confortable with a rewrite of <asm/mmu_context.h> :(
>>
>> So what about this patch, is this v3 acceptable ?
>
> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Other than the #ifdef thing, the same:
Acked-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists