[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150413150515.GV21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:05:15 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lizefan@...wei.com, anton@...ba.org, bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
mingo@...nel.org, serge@...lyn.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] cpuset: Add knob to make allowed masks hotplug
invariant on legacy hierarchy
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:50:52AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 07:41:52PM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> > Moreover the default hierarchy keeps the allowed masks hotplug invariant
> > too. So the patch is not bringing about a fundamental change in the
> > design of cgroups.
>
> This is gonna be a new behavior anyway and I don't follow why you just
> can't use the default hierarchy (well, of course except for that it
> isn't ready yet but no matter what we do this is gonna take another
> devel cycle so what's the difference?). It's not like the default
> hierarchy requires invasive changes. I'm not convinced this calls for
> yet another operation mode.
So TJ and me don't often seem to agree on cgroup stuffs, but here we do
;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists