[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150413110640.40f137c4@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 11:06:40 -0400
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: kernel/timer: avoid spurious ksoftirqd wakeups (v2)
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 11:25:49 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2015, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 15:09:07 -0300
> > > It seems a valid solution for this interrupt is to program
> > > sched_timer to the nearest future possible.
> >
> > What about calling the timer function right there, like
> > hrtimer_interrupt() does?
>
> No, you cannot call the timer function from the enqueue path. The
> caller might hold a lock which is taken in the callback as well.....
Fair enough. We're going to think about a different solution.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists