linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] libata: Add an additional LPM policy to match Intel recommendations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150413175621.GI2596@htj.duckdns.org>
Date:	Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:56:21 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...eos.com>
Cc:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...eos.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: Add an additional LPM policy to match Intel
 recommendations

Hello,

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:52:59AM -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Ok - my only real concern there was that we might end up changing the
> semantics of medium_power enough that it would break somebody. I'll
> post a patch to do that instead and I guess we can see what happens -
> worst case we revert it and add a new one.

Yeah, that sounds like a good plan to me.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/