[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyWonZVCwynECu1TgpraNnQ_K8YzHf9oPMUM3-St-QaPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 11:31:50 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Align jump targets to 1 byte boundaries
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf
<markus@...ppelsdorf.de> wrote:
>
> I must have made a measurement mistake above, because the actual code
> size savings are roughly 5%:
Can you check against the -fno-guess-branch-probability output?
Does lto (without pgo) perhaps end up undoing a lot of the random
"branch out and back" noise?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists