linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3 05/28] IB/Verbs: Reform IB-core sa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373A8FC0A58@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Apr 2015 18:45:08 +0000
From:	"Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>
To:	Michael Wang <yun.wang@...fitbricks.com>,
	Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
	Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
	"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Tom Tucker <tom@...ngridcomputing.com>,
	Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
	Hoang-Nam Nguyen <hnguyen@...ibm.com>,
	Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
	infinipath <infinipath@...el.com>,
	"Eli Cohen" <eli@...lanox.com>,
	"Latif, Faisal" <faisal.latif@...el.com>,
	"Jack Morgenstein" <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>,
	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
	"Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@...el.com>, "Tom Talpey" <tom@...pey.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 05/28] IB/Verbs: Reform IB-core sa_query

> @@ -1153,9 +1153,7 @@ static void ib_sa_add_one(struct ib_device *device)
>  {
>  	struct ib_sa_device *sa_dev;
>  	int s, e, i;
> -
> -	if (rdma_node_get_transport(device->node_type) != RDMA_TRANSPORT_IB)
> -		return;
> +	int count = 0;
> 
>  	if (device->node_type == RDMA_NODE_IB_SWITCH)
>  		s = e = 0;
> @@ -1175,7 +1173,7 @@ static void ib_sa_add_one(struct ib_device *device)
> 
>  	for (i = 0; i <= e - s; ++i) {
>  		spin_lock_init(&sa_dev->port[i].ah_lock);
> -		if (rdma_port_get_link_layer(device, i + 1) !=
> IB_LINK_LAYER_INFINIBAND)
> +		if (!rdma_tech_ib(device, i + 1))

Note for someone who cares.  This patch didn't introduce this problem, but I think the port number should be "i + s".