[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <552C1FA4.7080504@nod.at>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 21:57:24 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, daniel@...que.org,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1
Am 13.04.2015 um 21:54 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 09:49:27PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>> I remain opposed to this half thought out trash of an ABI for the
>>>> meta-data.
>>>
>>> You don't have to enable the metadata if you don't want to use it, it's
>>> an option :)
>>
>> Wasn't this also an argument for CONFIG_CGROUPS?
>> Now we're forced to enable it by default to boot a recent distro
>> and CONFIG_CGROUPS is still not fixed.
>
> CONFIG_CGROUPS is "not fixed"? I think Tejun would like to have some
> words with you :)
Tejun is working on it and does a *very* good job. But as long the unified
hirarchy is not complete/stable we're facing issues.
Ever tried to run systemd a linux container? ;)
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists