[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1428958492.2605.22.camel@j-VirtualBox>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:54:52 -0700
From: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
"vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"pjt@...gle.com" <pjt@...gle.com>,
"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"efault@....de" <efault@....de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"iamjoonsoo.kim@....com" <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
"svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com" <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
jason.low2@...com
Subject: Re: sched: Improve load balancing in the presence of idle CPUs
On Fri, 2015-04-10 at 14:07 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> At this point, I also wanted to understand why we do
> "nohz.next_balance++" nohz_balancer_kick()?
So this looks like something that was added to avoid
nohz_balancer_kick() getting called too frequently. Otherwise, it may
get called in each trigger_load_balance(), even when another CPU has
already been kicked to do balancing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists