linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] XSA120 follows to the Linux kernel.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <552CEFCF0200007800071C0A@mail.emea.novell.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:45:35 +0100
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	<david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:	<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] XSA120 follows to the Linux kernel.

>>> On 10.04.15 at 16:37, <david.vrabel@...rix.com> wrote:
> On 03/04/15 15:28, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> Hey David and Boris,
>> 
>> Please see the two patches - the first one fixes an situation that
>> the original XSA-120 patch hadn't considered.
>> 
>> The second patch is more of just a cleanup. Can be 4.1 material.
> 
> Applied both to devel/for-linus-4.1 since 4.0 is imminent (possibly),
> thanks.

And considering Sander's bisection result posted yesterday (plus
the - afaict - still unaddressed question raised by IanC regarding
the correctness wrt to bits other than 0 and 1) I suppose you
dropped them again?

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/