[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150414112241.3dbad71a@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:22:41 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hai Li <hali@...eaurora.org>, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
Hi Bjorn,
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 18:07:06 -0700 Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com> wrote:
>
> What Mark mean is basically that there shouldn't be any users of
> regulator_set_optimum_mode() for various reasons and we introduced
> regulator_set_load() to solve these, before any users popped up.
>
> Unfortunately we weren't fast enough and people got some code in that
> uses the API that isn't implemented for any Qualcomm platform today...
Ah, OK.
> Your patch looks correct and should preferrably be added to the drm
> tree, or the last patch in my series that drops the API wrapper should
> be held back until rc1(?)
It needs to be sent to Linus as a merge fix when the drm tree is merged.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists