[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1429025126.7346.36.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:25:26 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netns: deinline net_generic()
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 17:04 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On 04/14/2015 04:21 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 15:57 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> >
> >> My allyesconfig, with BUG_ON's commented out:
> >>
> >
> > Right. But I can tell you nobody uses lockdep on a production kernel.
> >
> > Here, at Google, we get what I described.
>
> I'm trying to get to the .config which generates a small function.
>
> So far, with LOCKDEP off, it is still this big:
>
If you read exactly what I wrote, you'll understand that at Google,
rcu_read_lock() & rcu_read_unlock() are nop.
Your patch is based on a worst case scenario, and will slow down our use
case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists