[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150414193229.GB6107@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 21:32:29 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 09:24:29PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 09:23:57PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > You might not like the design, but it is a valid design. Again, we
> > don't refuse to support hardware that is designed badly.
>
> Yeah except the small difference that unlike this, we can't change
> hardware.
And we can't change the design/implementation of many things, again,
it's not the kernel's job to prevent something, just because we don't
like the RFC, from being accepted.
Go read Havoc's email about why the design is the way it is that I just
posted. Maybe we are the ones that really don't know the issues
involved enough to say that the current design is somehow "wrong".
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists