[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150414194004.GG889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 20:40:04 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 09:32:29PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 09:24:29PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 09:23:57PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > You might not like the design, but it is a valid design. Again, we
> > > don't refuse to support hardware that is designed badly.
> >
> > Yeah except the small difference that unlike this, we can't change
> > hardware.
>
> And we can't change the design/implementation of many things, again,
> it's not the kernel's job to prevent something, just because we don't
> like the RFC, from being accepted.
Translate, please. What exactly will be prevented by NAK on your Fine
Piece Of Software? Not dbus working as it does, surely?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists