[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150414195336.GG14069@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 21:53:36 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 09:48:04PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> It's not going to stop anything from working, it's just going to stop
> some programs from being able to do things they really want to do (see
> the first email for examples.)
Until it is made "mandatory" as Al said earlier.
> Yes, we could make this live outside the kernel tree, but that's not the
> way we work anymore.
> We merge things that are useful, that match our
> security and coding requirements, and are going to be maintained by
> people we trust.
We trust? I'm not going to even comment on that.
And frankly, merging a useful piece of code sounds completely different
to me than this serious backlash I'm reading from the sidelines.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists