[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150414205009.GA35263@dtor-ws>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:50:09 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Nick Dyer <nick.dyer@...ev.co.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/chrome: chromeos_laptop - do not probe
devices on Pixel 1
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 10:41:54AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 04:57:59PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Atmel MXT devices use different i2c addresses, depending on the current
> > mode of operation (bootloader or application). The new Atmel MXT driver
> > expects i2c client's address contain the application address of the
> > chip, and calculates the expected bootloader address form the
> > application address. Unfortunately chromeos_laptop does probe the
> > devices and if touchpad (or touchscreen, or both) comes up in bootloader
> > mode, the i2c device gets instantiated with the bootloader address
> > instead of application address, which confuses the driver.
> >
> > Given that hardware on Pixel is set and is not going to change let's not
> > try to probe devices to see if they are present or not, but rather
> > instantiate them always at expected addresses.
> >
> > Since all devices are now probed and/or instantiated at given address,
> > we no longer need to support probing multiple addresses for the same
>
> Hmm, that strategy won't work on C720 since there are devices with touchscreen
> and without one, so we do want to probe but always instantiate at primary
> address. V3 will be upcoming...
OK, new version. Not sending to the wide world for now in case we decide
it is too ugly...
>From 480ea02024a0b9a2ad2f91e2e0ca02f34577972c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:59:32 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] platform/chrome: chromeos_laptop - instantiate Atmel at
primary address
The new Atmel MXT driver expects i2c client's address contain the
primary (main address) of the chip, and calculates the expected
bootloader address form the primary address. Unfortunately chrome_laptop
does probe the devices and if touchpad (or touchscreen, or both) comes
up in bootloader mode the i2c device gets instantiated with the
bootloader address which confuses the driver.
To work around this issue let's probe the primary address first. If the
device is not detected at the primary address we'll probe alternative
addresses as "dummy" devices. If any of them are found, destroy the
dummy client and instantiate client with proper name at primary address
still.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
---
drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_laptop.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_laptop.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_laptop.c
index b84fdd6..a04019a 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_laptop.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_laptop.c
@@ -133,12 +133,13 @@ static struct i2c_client *__add_probed_i2c_device(
const char *name,
int bus,
struct i2c_board_info *info,
- const unsigned short *addrs)
+ const unsigned short *alt_addr_list)
{
const struct dmi_device *dmi_dev;
const struct dmi_dev_onboard *dev_data;
struct i2c_adapter *adapter;
- struct i2c_client *client;
+ struct i2c_client *client = NULL;
+ const unsigned short addr_list[] = { info->addr, I2C_CLIENT_END };
if (bus < 0)
return NULL;
@@ -169,8 +170,28 @@ static struct i2c_client *__add_probed_i2c_device(
return NULL;
}
- /* add the i2c device */
- client = i2c_new_probed_device(adapter, info, addrs, NULL);
+ /*
+ * Add the i2c device. If we can't detect it at the primary
+ * address we scan secondary addresses. In any case the client
+ * structure gets assigned primary address.
+ */
+ client = i2c_new_probed_device(adapter, info, addr_list, NULL);
+ if (!client && alt_addr_list) {
+ struct i2c_board_info dummy_info = {
+ I2C_BOARD_INFO("dummy", info->addr),
+ };
+ struct i2c_client *dummy;
+
+ dummy = i2c_new_probed_device(adapter, &dummy_info,
+ alt_addr_list, NULL);
+ if (dummy) {
+ pr_debug("%s %d-%02x is probed at %02x\n",
+ __func__, bus, info->addr, dummy->addr);
+ i2c_unregister_device(dummy);
+ client = i2c_new_device(adapter, info);
+ }
+ }
+
if (!client)
pr_notice("%s failed to register device %d-%02x\n",
__func__, bus, info->addr);
@@ -254,12 +275,10 @@ static struct i2c_client *add_i2c_device(const char *name,
enum i2c_adapter_type type,
struct i2c_board_info *info)
{
- const unsigned short addr_list[] = { info->addr, I2C_CLIENT_END };
-
return __add_probed_i2c_device(name,
find_i2c_adapter_num(type),
info,
- addr_list);
+ NULL);
}
static int setup_cyapa_tp(enum i2c_adapter_type type)
@@ -275,7 +294,6 @@ static int setup_cyapa_tp(enum i2c_adapter_type type)
static int setup_atmel_224s_tp(enum i2c_adapter_type type)
{
const unsigned short addr_list[] = { ATMEL_TP_I2C_BL_ADDR,
- ATMEL_TP_I2C_ADDR,
I2C_CLIENT_END };
if (tp)
return 0;
@@ -289,7 +307,6 @@ static int setup_atmel_224s_tp(enum i2c_adapter_type type)
static int setup_atmel_1664s_ts(enum i2c_adapter_type type)
{
const unsigned short addr_list[] = { ATMEL_TS_I2C_BL_ADDR,
- ATMEL_TS_I2C_ADDR,
I2C_CLIENT_END };
if (ts)
return 0;
--
2.2.0.rc0.207.ga3a616c
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists