[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150415151926.GS23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:19:26 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, tj@...nel.org,
svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lizefan@...wei.com, anton@...ba.org, bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] cpuset: Add knob to make allowed masks hotplug
invariant on legacy hierarchy
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:03:02AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Peter, is the question "why can't we just use the unified hierarchy for
> cpusets"?
No, the question is why can't you use the unified hierarchy cpuset
semantics -- without the actual unified hierarchy stuff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists