[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <75BEAE20-81A9-4567-8AB2-1C1865A0B72D@sperl.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:37:46 +0200
From: Martin Sperl <martin@...rl.org>
To: Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>
Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, vinod.koul@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jonathan@...pberrypi.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: bcm2835: Add slave dma support
> On 15.04.2015, at 11:56, Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org> wrote:
> +#define MAX_LITE_TRANSFER (SZ_64K - 1)
> +#define MAX_NORMAL_TRANSFER SZ_1G
...
> + if (c->ch >= 8) /* LITE channel */
> + max_size = MAX_LITE_TRANSFER;
> + else
> + max_size = MAX_NORMAL_TRANSFER;
> + period_len = min(period_len, max_size);
> + d->frames = (buf_len - 1) / (period_len + 1);
I wonder if it is wise to split the transfers on 65535 bytes for the
Lite DMA-channels - especially if you are transferring to word size
registers (like SPI_FIFO), you still push 16384 words into the register
and the last word of this transfer (word 16384) still is assumed 4 valid
bytes by the device and thus gets operated upon - even if the last byte
contains garbage from the DMA-transfer point of view.
So maybe it is better to separate on SZ_64K-4 or better still SZ_32K to
be on a power of 2 address boundary.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists