[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <552EABA3.30109@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:19:15 -0700
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@...citrix.com>,
Jonathan Davies <Jonathan.Davies@...rix.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@...rix.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Felipe Franciosi <felipe.franciosi@...rix.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] "tcp: refine TSO autosizing" causes performance regression
on Xen
On 04/15/2015 11:08 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 10:55 -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> Have you tested this patch on a NIC without GSO/TSO ?
>>>
>>> This would allow more than 500 packets for a single flow.
>>>
>>> Hello bufferbloat.
>>
>> Woudln't the fq_codel qdisc on that interface address that problem?
>
> Last time I checked, default qdisc was pfifo_fast.
Bummer.
> These guys do not want to change a sysctl, how pfifo_fast will magically
> becomes fq_codel ?
Well, I'm not sure that it is George and Jonathan themselves who don't
want to change a sysctl, but the customers who would have to tweak that
in their VMs?
rick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists