[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150415203947.GB15877@phlsvsds.ph.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:39:47 -0400
From: "ira.weiny" <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: "Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>
Cc: Hal Rosenstock <hal@....mellanox.co.il>,
Michael Wang <yun.wang@...fitbricks.com>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Tucker <tom@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Hoang-Nam Nguyen <hnguyen@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
infinipath <infinipath@...el.com>, Eli Cohen <eli@...lanox.com>,
"Latif, Faisal" <faisal.latif@...el.com>,
Jack Morgenstein <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/28] IB/Verbs: Implement new callback query_transport()
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:29:31PM -0600, Hefty, Sean wrote:
> > libibverbs also exposes transport at the device level. Isn't a change to
> > make transport per port rather than per device needed there as well to
> > be consistent with these proposed kernel changes ? If so, would the
> > additional IBoE transport be exposed ? We also need to worry about
> > backward compatibility for existing applications.
>
> Libibverbs probably can't change without bumping the major version number. If the kernel attribute structures change, this is probably something that the user_verbs module would need to handle to avoid breaking the ABI.
>
Transport is not directly sent thought the kernel ABI. It is fabricated when
the HCA provider driver is loaded.
static struct ibv_device *try_driver(struct ibv_driver *driver,
struct ibv_sysfs_dev *sysfs_dev)
{
...
switch (dev->node_type) {
case IBV_NODE_CA:
case IBV_NODE_SWITCH:
case IBV_NODE_ROUTER:
dev->transport_type = IBV_TRANSPORT_IB;
break;
case IBV_NODE_RNIC:
dev->transport_type = IBV_TRANSPORT_IWARP;
break;
case IBV_NODE_USNIC:
dev->transport_type = IBV_TRANSPORT_USNIC;
break;
case IBV_NODE_USNIC_UDP:
dev->transport_type = IBV_TRANSPORT_USNIC_UDP;
break;
default:
dev->transport_type = IBV_TRANSPORT_UNKNOWN;
break;
}
...
}
I'm not sure how to fix this once we get to the user space problem. But I
don't think it affects this set of patches.
Ira
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists