linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 0/8] introduce dynamic device creation/removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 15 Apr 2015 14:37:17 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/8] introduce dynamic device creation/removal

On Tue,  3 Mar 2015 21:49:42 +0900 Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> This patchset introduces zram-control sysfs class, which has two sysfs
> attrs:
>  - zram_add     -- add a new specific (device_id) zram device
>  - zram_remove  -- remove a specific (device_id) zram device

This patchset and the "make automatic device_id generation possible"
still appear to have quite a few unresolved issues.  So I'm holding
them out of the 4.1 merge window.

Unfortunately these were the first-arriving zram patches, so the later
ones required quite a bit of mangling.  Hopefully I got it all right.

This was all a bit disruptive.  Please let's not leave major patchsets
floating about in an incomplete/unresolved state for week after week?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/