[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <552DFFC1.6050806@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:35:53 +0530
From: Shreyas B Prabhu <shreyas@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
CC: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] powerpc/powernv: Introduce sysfs control for fastsleep
workaround behavior
>
> A point that bothers me here is if we can potentially race with cpu
> hotplug ? If cpuX and its siblings are offline and it was interrupted to
> come online:
>
> cpuX cpuY
> Interrupted to come online
> Undo workaround
>
> Nop the fastsleep_workaround_exit path
> IPI online cores: apply workaround once
>
> Set yourself in the online mask
> Nop the fastsleep_workaround_entry path
>
>
> This results in cpuX undoing the workaround on its core, never to set it
> back again.
>
> So should we protect the region between the beginning and end of
> patching instructions with get_online_cpus() and put_online_cpus() ?
>
Nice catch. I had missed this. Sending out a patch correcting this.
Thanks,
Shreyas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists