lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150416075450.GY32271@localhost>
Date:	Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:54:50 +0200
From:	Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
To:	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] timekeeping: Limit system time to prevent 32-bit
 time_t overflow

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:31:54PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:41:28 +0200
> Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com> wrote:
> > larger value. When the maximum is reached in normal time accumulation,
> > the clock will be stepped back by one week.
> 
> Which itself is open to exploits and dirty tricks and causes bizarre
> problems.

Any examples? I think it shouldn't be any worse than having system
clock with incorrect time and making a backward step, which is a well
understood problem.

> IMHO it doesn't actually improve the situation.

Do you have a 32-bit system for testing? Try "date -s @2147483600",
wait one minute and see if it's not worth preventing.

I think the power consumption alone is worth it. If there is some
widely used application/service in which the overflow triggers an
infinite loop making requests to a network service, maybe it could
prevent a DDoS attack.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ