[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150416120127.GM2866@leverpostej>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:01:27 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>,
Tim Bird <tbird20d@...il.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] DT: hwspinlock: Add binding documentation for
Qualcomm hwmutex
> The part I'm not clear what the purpose of "pool-hwlock" was.
One use-case was a set of hwlocks having no fixed purpose, and being
available for dynamic allocation between the OS and other entities (e.g.
some RTOS on another core).
The set of locks forming a reusable pool, and any information associated
with them (e.g. the logical IDs used by the other entity) are a property
of that interface rather than the hwlock provider.
So you'd describe those pools of locks in some interface-specific
manner, consuming hwlocks from a set of hwlock providers.
Hopefully that doesn't maek things less clear...
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists