| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <552FB6CA.1040106@dev.mellanox.co.il>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:19:06 -0400
From: Hal Rosenstock <hal@....mellanox.co.il>
To: Michael Wang <yun.wang@...fitbricks.com>
CC: Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tom Tucker <tom@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Hoang-Nam Nguyen <hnguyen@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
Mike Marciniszyn <infinipath@...el.com>,
Eli Cohen <eli@...lanox.com>,
Faisal Latif <faisal.latif@...el.com>,
Jack Morgenstein <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/27] IB/Verbs: Reform cma_acquire_dev()
On 4/16/2015 4:09 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
>
> Reform cma_acquire_dev() with management helpers, introduce
> cma_validate_port() to make the code more clean.
>
> Cc: Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
> Cc: Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> Cc: Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <yun.wang@...fitbricks.com>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
> index b520882..902cc1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
> @@ -370,18 +370,36 @@ static int cma_translate_addr(struct sockaddr *addr, struct rdma_dev_addr *dev_a
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static inline int cma_validate_port(struct ib_device *device, u8 port,
> + union ib_gid *gid, int dev_type)
> +{
> + u8 found_port;
> + int ret = -ENODEV;
> +
> + if ((dev_type == ARPHRD_INFINIBAND) && !rdma_tech_ib(device, port))
> + return ret;
> +
> + if ((dev_type != ARPHRD_INFINIBAND) && rdma_tech_ib(device, port))
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = ib_find_cached_gid(device, gid, &found_port, NULL);
> +
> + if (!ret && (port == found_port))
> + return 0;
> +
> + return ret;
Should the case where ret = 0 and port != found_port need to be handled
the same as currently ? It looks different to me since in this case the
port will be saved into id_priv->id.port_num whereas currently it isn't.
-- Hal
> +}
> +
> static int cma_acquire_dev(struct rdma_id_private *id_priv,
> struct rdma_id_private *listen_id_priv)
> {
> struct rdma_dev_addr *dev_addr = &id_priv->id.route.addr.dev_addr;
> struct cma_device *cma_dev;
> - union ib_gid gid, iboe_gid;
> + union ib_gid gid, iboe_gid, *gidp;
> int ret = -ENODEV;
> - u8 port, found_port;
> - enum rdma_link_layer dev_ll = dev_addr->dev_type == ARPHRD_INFINIBAND ?
> - IB_LINK_LAYER_INFINIBAND : IB_LINK_LAYER_ETHERNET;
> + u8 port;
>
> - if (dev_ll != IB_LINK_LAYER_INFINIBAND &&
> + if (dev_addr->dev_type != ARPHRD_INFINIBAND &&
> id_priv->id.ps == RDMA_PS_IPOIB)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> @@ -391,41 +409,36 @@ static int cma_acquire_dev(struct rdma_id_private *id_priv,
>
> memcpy(&gid, dev_addr->src_dev_addr +
> rdma_addr_gid_offset(dev_addr), sizeof gid);
> - if (listen_id_priv &&
> - rdma_port_get_link_layer(listen_id_priv->id.device,
> - listen_id_priv->id.port_num) == dev_ll) {
> +
> + if (listen_id_priv) {
> cma_dev = listen_id_priv->cma_dev;
> port = listen_id_priv->id.port_num;
> - if (rdma_node_get_transport(cma_dev->device->node_type) == RDMA_TRANSPORT_IB &&
> - rdma_port_get_link_layer(cma_dev->device, port) == IB_LINK_LAYER_ETHERNET)
> - ret = ib_find_cached_gid(cma_dev->device, &iboe_gid,
> - &found_port, NULL);
> - else
> - ret = ib_find_cached_gid(cma_dev->device, &gid,
> - &found_port, NULL);
> + gidp = rdma_tech_iboe(cma_dev->device, port) ?
> + &iboe_gid : &gid;
>
> - if (!ret && (port == found_port)) {
> - id_priv->id.port_num = found_port;
> + ret = cma_validate_port(cma_dev->device, port, gidp,
> + dev_addr->dev_type);
> + if (!ret) {
> + id_priv->id.port_num = port;
> goto out;
> }
> }
> +
> list_for_each_entry(cma_dev, &dev_list, list) {
> for (port = 1; port <= cma_dev->device->phys_port_cnt; ++port) {
> if (listen_id_priv &&
> listen_id_priv->cma_dev == cma_dev &&
> listen_id_priv->id.port_num == port)
> continue;
> - if (rdma_port_get_link_layer(cma_dev->device, port) == dev_ll) {
> - if (rdma_node_get_transport(cma_dev->device->node_type) == RDMA_TRANSPORT_IB &&
> - rdma_port_get_link_layer(cma_dev->device, port) == IB_LINK_LAYER_ETHERNET)
> - ret = ib_find_cached_gid(cma_dev->device, &iboe_gid, &found_port, NULL);
> - else
> - ret = ib_find_cached_gid(cma_dev->device, &gid, &found_port, NULL);
> -
> - if (!ret && (port == found_port)) {
> - id_priv->id.port_num = found_port;
> - goto out;
> - }
> +
> + gidp = rdma_tech_iboe(cma_dev->device, port) ?
> + &iboe_gid : &gid;
> +
> + ret = cma_validate_port(cma_dev->device, port, gidp,
> + dev_addr->dev_type);
> + if (!ret) {
> + id_priv->id.port_num = port;
> + goto out;
> }
> }
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists