[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150416155408.GU27490@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:54:08 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Darren Hart <darren@...art.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
fredrik.markstrom@...driver.com,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] futex: avoid double wake up in futex_wake() on -RT
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 07:42:55AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 12:16 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > But if we decide we want to go do this, I'd propose we reintroduce this
> > delayed wake list thing again.
>
> Given that futexes aren't the only potential users, I definitely agree.
> Lemme cleanup the patches and I'll resend. Now, one thing I wonder about
> is if we should bother making it a delayed list a plist instead -- as
> not all users would consider rt-tasks like futexes do.
plist don't work and should not be used for tasks anymore. I suppose I
should go rip them out of futexes too. If you want to make the thing
priority aware we should probably abstract the rb-tree from rtmutex.c
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists