[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150416155823.GB21809@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:58:23 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Michael Wang <yun.wang@...fitbricks.com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tom Tucker <tom@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Hoang-Nam Nguyen <hnguyen@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
Mike Marciniszyn <infinipath@...el.com>,
Eli Cohen <eli@...lanox.com>,
Faisal Latif <faisal.latif@...el.com>,
Jack Morgenstein <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, hal@....mellanox.co.il
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/27] IB/Verbs: Reform cm related part in IB-core
cma/ucm
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:08:10AM +0200, Michael Wang wrote:
>
> Use raw management helpers to reform cm related part in IB-core cma/ucm.
>
> These checks focus on the device cm type rather than the port capability,
> directly pass port 1 works currently, but can't support mixing cm type
> device in future.
After the discussion settled, I ended up thinking that implementing
explicit device checks, for use by CM, and the BUG_ON at register to
require all ports have the same value was the best option.
It also looks like hardwired 1 won't work on switch ports, so it is no-go.
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists