[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150416164418.GC22946@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:44:18 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Michael Wang <yun.wang@...fitbricks.com>
Cc: "Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
"Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Tucker <tom@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Hoang-Nam Nguyen <hnguyen@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
infinipath <infinipath@...el.com>, Eli Cohen <eli@...lanox.com>,
"Latif, Faisal" <faisal.latif@...el.com>,
Jack Morgenstein <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>, Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/28] IB/Verbs: Reform IB-ulp ipoib
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 09:58:18AM +0200, Michael Wang wrote:
> We can give client->add() callback a return value and make
> ib_register_device() return -ENOMEM when it failed, just wondering
> why we don't do this at first, any special reason?
No idea, but having ib_register_device fail and unwind if a client
fails to attach makes sense to me.
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists