[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150416163745.GA29567@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 18:37:45 +0200
From: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@...gutronix.de>
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:22:18PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > The reason that 'everyone who works in this area' adopted is not as much
> > that the design is sound (I'm not arguing whether it is or isn't in this
> > case) as it is that none of them could come up with anything better.
>
> Actually most message passing code uses things like JMS and the various
> MQ libraries. Most IoT uses things other than dbus, small deep embedded
> never uses dbus.
For what it's worth: we more and more use dbus for small deep embedded
systems, IoT, loosely coupled industrial control applications etc.
rsc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists