[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373A8FC2508@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:30:34 +0000
From: "Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>
To: Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
Michael Wang <yun.wang@...fitbricks.com>,
"Hal Rosenstock" <hal@....mellanox.co.il>
CC: Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Tucker <tom@...ngridcomputing.com>,
"Steve Wise" <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Hoang-Nam Nguyen <hnguyen@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
infinipath <infinipath@...el.com>,
"Eli Cohen" <eli@...lanox.com>,
"Latif, Faisal" <faisal.latif@...el.com>,
"Jack Morgenstein" <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
"Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 10/27] IB/Verbs: Reform cm related part in IB-core
cma/ucm
> > To be confirmed:
> > PORT ASSIGNED
> > rdma_init_qp_attr Y
> > rdma_destroy_id unknown
> > cma_listen_on_dev N
> > cma_bind_loopback N
Bind loopback will attach to a port, but the id does not have on entry.
> > rdma_listen N
>
> Why "N"? rdma_listen() can be constrained to a single port, right?
> And even if wildcarded, it needs to act on multiple ports, which is
> to say, it will fail only if no ports are eligible.
Rdma listen should be unknown. The id may be assigned to a port. It depends on the source address.
> > rdma_connect Y
> > rdma_accept Y
> > rdma_reject Y
> > rdma_disconnect Y
> > ib_ucm_add_one N
Others look correct.
Btw, thanks for your work on this. I know this is becoming a much bigger change than you originally intended. :)
- Sean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists