[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2807E5FD2F6FDA4886F6618EAC48510E0CC8C0D9@CRSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:41:33 +0000
From: "Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Hal Rosenstock <hal@....mellanox.co.il>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
CC: Michael Wang <yun.wang@...fitbricks.com>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
"Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Tucker <tom@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Hoang-Nam Nguyen <hnguyen@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
infinipath <infinipath@...el.com>, Eli Cohen <eli@...lanox.com>,
"Latif, Faisal" <faisal.latif@...el.com>,
Jack Morgenstein <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>,
"Or Gerlitz" <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
"Tom Talpey" <tom@...pey.com>, Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 10/27] IB/Verbs: Reform cm related part in IB-core
cma/ucm
>
> On 4/16/2015 11:58 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > It also looks like hardwired 1 won't work on switch ports, so it is no-go.
>
> AFAIK enhanced switch port 0 is not supported by CM/RDMA CM in the current
> code. There is no need for CM/RDMA CM on base switch port 0.
I concur and I thought I mentioned that before.
Ira
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists