[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150416180932.GW889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:09:32 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] fs: use a sequence counter instead of file_lock in
fd_install
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 02:16:31PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> @@ -165,8 +165,10 @@ static int expand_fdtable(struct files_struct *files, int nr)
> cur_fdt = files_fdtable(files);
> if (nr >= cur_fdt->max_fds) {
> /* Continue as planned */
> + write_seqcount_begin(&files->fdt_seqcount);
> copy_fdtable(new_fdt, cur_fdt);
> rcu_assign_pointer(files->fdt, new_fdt);
> + write_seqcount_end(&files->fdt_seqcount);
> if (cur_fdt != &files->fdtab)
> call_rcu(&cur_fdt->rcu, free_fdtable_rcu);
Interesting. AFAICS, your test doesn't step anywhere near that path,
does it? So basically you never hit the retries during that...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists