linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH kernel v8 12/31] powerpc/spapr: vfio: Switch from iommu_table to new iommu_table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5530D66F.3070208@ozlabs.ru>
Date:	Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:46:23 +1000
From:	Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
To:	David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
CC:	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kernel v8 12/31] powerpc/spapr: vfio: Switch from iommu_table
 to new iommu_table_group

On 04/16/2015 03:55 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 04:30:54PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> Modern IBM POWERPC systems support multiple (currently two) TCE tables
>> per IOMMU group (a.k.a. PE). This adds a iommu_table_group container
>> for TCE tables. Right now just one table is supported.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/iommu.h            |  18 +++--
>>   arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c                 |  34 ++++----
>>   arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c   |  38 +++++----
>>   arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-p5ioc2.c |  17 ++--
>>   arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c        |   2 +-
>>   arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h        |   4 +-
>>   arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c      |   9 ++-
>>   drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c         | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>   8 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/iommu.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/iommu.h
>> index eb75726..667aa1a 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/iommu.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/iommu.h
>> @@ -90,9 +90,7 @@ struct iommu_table {
>>   	struct iommu_pool pools[IOMMU_NR_POOLS];
>>   	unsigned long *it_map;       /* A simple allocation bitmap for now */
>>   	unsigned long  it_page_shift;/* table iommu page size */
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_API
>> -	struct iommu_group *it_group;
>> -#endif
>> +	struct iommu_table_group *it_group;
>>   	struct iommu_table_ops *it_ops;
>>   	void (*set_bypass)(struct iommu_table *tbl, bool enable);
>>   };
>> @@ -126,14 +124,24 @@ extern void iommu_free_table(struct iommu_table *tbl, const char *node_name);
>>    */
>>   extern struct iommu_table *iommu_init_table(struct iommu_table * tbl,
>>   					    int nid);
>> +
>> +#define IOMMU_TABLE_GROUP_MAX_TABLES	1
>> +
>> +struct iommu_table_group {
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_API
>> -extern void iommu_register_group(struct iommu_table *tbl,
>> +	struct iommu_group *group;
>> +#endif
>> +	struct iommu_table tables[IOMMU_TABLE_GROUP_MAX_TABLES];
>
> There's nothing to indicate which of the tables are in use at the
> current time.  I mean, it doesn't matter now because there's only one,
> but the patch doesn't make a whole lot of sense without that.


Later in the patchset, the code will look at @it_size to know if the table 
is in use.


>
>> +};
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_API
>> +extern void iommu_register_group(struct iommu_table_group *table_group,
>>   				 int pci_domain_number, unsigned long pe_num);
>>   extern int iommu_add_device(struct device *dev);
>>   extern void iommu_del_device(struct device *dev);
>>   extern int __init tce_iommu_bus_notifier_init(void);
>>   #else
>> -static inline void iommu_register_group(struct iommu_table *tbl,
>> +static inline void iommu_register_group(struct iommu_table_group *table_group,
>>   					int pci_domain_number,
>>   					unsigned long pe_num)
>>   {
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
>> index b39d00a..fd49c8e 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
>> @@ -712,17 +712,20 @@ struct iommu_table *iommu_init_table(struct iommu_table *tbl, int nid)
>>
>>   struct iommu_table *iommu_table_alloc(int node)
>>   {
>> -	struct iommu_table *tbl;
>> +	struct iommu_table_group *table_group;
>>
>> -	tbl = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct iommu_table), GFP_KERNEL, node);
>> +	table_group = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct iommu_table_group), GFP_KERNEL,
>> +			   node);
>> +	table_group->tables[0].it_group = table_group;
>>
>> -	return tbl;
>> +	return &table_group->tables[0];
>>   }
>>
>>   void iommu_free_table(struct iommu_table *tbl, const char *node_name)
>
> Surely the free function should take a table group rather than a table
> as argument.


Please ignore my other response to your reply; I reworked the whole thing 
to store iommu_table_group in the pci device node. Thanks.


-- 
Alexey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/