linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.19 013/101] ARC: signal handling robustify

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150417132514.982094795@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 17 Apr 2015 15:28:01 +0200
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@...opsys.com>,
	Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.19 013/101] ARC: signal handling robustify

3.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>

commit e4140819dadc3624accac8294881bca8a3cba4ed upstream.

A malicious signal handler / restorer can DOS the system by fudging the
user regs saved on stack, causing weird things such as sigreturn returning
to user mode PC but cpu state still being kernel mode....

Ensure that in sigreturn path status32 always has U bit; any other bogosity
(gargbage PC etc) will be taken care of by normal user mode exceptions mechanisms.

Reproducer signal handler:

    void handle_sig(int signo, siginfo_t *info, void *context)
    {
	ucontext_t *uc = context;
	struct user_regs_struct *regs = &(uc->uc_mcontext.regs);

	regs->scratch.status32 = 0;
    }

Before the fix, kernel would go off to weeds like below:

    --------->8-----------
    [ARCLinux]$ ./signal-test
    Path: /signal-test
    CPU: 0 PID: 61 Comm: signal-test Not tainted 4.0.0-rc5+ #65
    task: 8f177880 ti: 5ffe6000 task.ti: 8f15c000

    [ECR   ]: 0x00220200 => Invalid Write @ 0x00000010 by insn @ 0x00010698
    [EFA   ]: 0x00000010
    [BLINK ]: 0x2007c1ee
    [ERET  ]: 0x10698
    [STAT32]: 0x00000000 :                                   <--------
    BTA: 0x00010680	 SP: 0x5ffe7e48	 FP: 0x00000000
    LPS: 0x20003c6c	LPE: 0x20003c70	LPC: 0x00000000
    ...
    --------->8-----------

Reported-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@...opsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/arc/kernel/signal.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arc/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/arc/kernel/signal.c
@@ -131,6 +131,15 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(rt_sigreturn)
 	/* Don't restart from sigreturn */
 	syscall_wont_restart(regs);
 
+	/*
+	 * Ensure that sigreturn always returns to user mode (in case the
+	 * regs saved on user stack got fudged between save and sigreturn)
+	 * Otherwise it is easy to panic the kernel with a custom
+	 * signal handler and/or restorer which clobberes the status32/ret
+	 * to return to a bogus location in kernel mode.
+	 */
+	regs->status32 |= STATUS_U_MASK;
+
 	return regs->r0;
 
 badframe:
@@ -229,8 +238,11 @@ setup_rt_frame(struct ksignal *ksig, sig
 
 	/*
 	 * handler returns using sigreturn stub provided already by userpsace
+	 * If not, nuke the process right away
 	 */
-	BUG_ON(!(ksig->ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_RESTORER));
+	if(!(ksig->ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_RESTORER))
+		return 1;
+
 	regs->blink = (unsigned long)ksig->ka.sa.sa_restorer;
 
 	/* User Stack for signal handler will be above the frame just carved */
@@ -296,12 +308,12 @@ static void
 handle_signal(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	sigset_t *oldset = sigmask_to_save();
-	int ret;
+	int failed;
 
 	/* Set up the stack frame */
-	ret = setup_rt_frame(ksig, oldset, regs);
+	failed = setup_rt_frame(ksig, oldset, regs);
 
-	signal_setup_done(ret, ksig, 0);
+	signal_setup_done(failed, ksig, 0);
 }
 
 void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/